LLM·Dex

Codestral 2 vs GPT-4o mini

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Codestral 2 specs · GPT-4o mini specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceGPT-4o mini

    GPT-4o mini is roughly 1.5× cheaper on output tokens ($0.60 vs $0.90 per 1M).

  • Context windowCodestral 2

    Codestral 2 accepts 256K tokens vs 128K, 2.0× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesGPT-4o mini

    GPT-4o mini supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Codestral 2.

  • OpennessCodestral 2

    Codestral 2 ships open weights (Mistral Non-Production License); GPT-4o mini is API-only.

It's a genuine coin-flip between Codestral 2 and GPT-4o mini: 2 category wins each, with the rest tied. GPT-4o mini is roughly 1.5× cheaper on output tokens ($0.60 vs $0.90 per 1M). Codestral 2 accepts 256K tokens vs 128K, 2.0× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Codestral 2 handles text while GPT-4o mini handles text, vision, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Codestral 2 ships open weights (Mistral Non-Production License); GPT-4o mini is API-only.

Codestral 2 is the newer of the two, released 6 months after GPT-4o mini, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Codestral 2 is usually picked for code completion and coding llm workloads, while GPT-4o mini sees more deployments in customer support and summarization. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecCodestral 2GPT-4o mini
ProviderMistralOpenAI
ReleasedJan 2025Jul 2024
Modalitiestexttext, vision
Context window256K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.30 / 1M tokens$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output · 1M$0.90 / 1M tokens$0.60 / 1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsYes (Mistral Non-Production License)No
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$2.25 vs $1.35
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$22.50 vs $13.50
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$50.40 vs $26.10

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: $2.25 vs $1.35 per month, model B comes out ahead. Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: $22.50 vs $13.50 per month, model B comes out ahead. RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: $50.40 vs $26.10 per month, model B comes out ahead.

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Codestral 2$0.075
  • GPT-4o mini$0.045

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Codestral 2GPT-4o mini
  • MMLU,82.0
  • HumanEval92.0
Pick Codestral 2 if

Codestral 2 fits when…

  • Fast inline completion
  • FIM support
  • Self-hostable for IP-sensitive teams
  • Long-context tasks, handles 256K tokens vs 128K for GPT-4o mini.
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Mistral Non-Production License).
Pick GPT-4o mini if

GPT-4o mini fits when…

  • Cheap
  • Fast
  • Mature
  • Cost-sensitive workloads, 1.5× cheaper than Codestral 2 on output tokens.
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Don't want either?

Consider Mistral Large 2

Mistral's flagship API model, strong on code and reasoning, EU-friendly hosting.

Frequently asked

  • Is Codestral 2 or GPT-4o mini cheaper?
    GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.60 / 1M tokens per million output tokens, vs $0.90 / 1M tokens for Codestral 2.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Codestral 2 accepts 256K tokens vs 128K for GPT-4o mini.
  • Is Codestral 2 or GPT-4o mini better for coding?
    Both Codestral 2 and GPT-4o mini are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Codestral 2 ships open weights (Mistral Non-Production License). GPT-4o mini is API-only.
  • When were Codestral 2 and GPT-4o mini released?
    Codestral 2 was released by Mistral on 2025-01-14. GPT-4o mini was released by OpenAI on 2024-07-18.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.