LLM·Dex
Newsletter

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Pixtral 12B

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Claude 3.5 Haiku specs · Pixtral 12B specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceClaude 3.5 Haiku

    Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Pixtral 12B does not.

  • Context windowClaude 3.5 Haiku

    Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesTie

    Both handle text, vision.

  • OpennessPixtral 12B

    Pixtral 12B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.

On balance Claude 3.5 Haiku edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 categories against Pixtral 12B's 1. Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Pixtral 12B does not. Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. Both target the same set of modalities (text, vision), so the deciding factors are price, context, and raw quality. Pixtral 12B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is the newer of the two, released 2 months after Pixtral 12B, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude 3.5 Haiku is usually picked for customer support and code completion workloads, while Pixtral 12B sees more deployments in vision and edge deployment. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude 3.5 HaikuPixtral 12B
ProviderAnthropicMistral
ReleasedNov 2024Sep 2024
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Context window200K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.80 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Output · 1M$4.00 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsNoYes (Apache-2.0)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$8.40 vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$84.00 vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$144 vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.280
  • Pixtral 12BPricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku if

Claude 3.5 Haiku fits when…

  • Fast
  • Cheap for Anthropic
  • Strong code at small size
  • Long-context tasks, handles 200K tokens vs 128K for Pixtral 12B.
Pick Pixtral 12B if

Pixtral 12B fits when…

  • Apache-2.0
  • Vision in 12B size
  • Single-GPU
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Apache-2.0).
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.

See Claude Opus 4.7 specsClaude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.7Pixtral 12B vs Claude Opus 4.7

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Pixtral 12B cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K for Pixtral 12B.
  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Pixtral 12B better for coding?
    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Pixtral 12B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Pixtral 12B ships open weights (Apache-2.0). Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.
  • When were Claude 3.5 Haiku and Pixtral 12B released?
    Claude 3.5 Haiku was released by Anthropic on 2024-11-04. Pixtral 12B was released by Mistral on 2024-09-17.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.