LLM·Dex

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.7

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Verdict by category
  • PriceClaude 3.5 Haiku

    Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Claude Opus 4.7 does not.

  • Context windowClaude Opus 4.7

    Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 200K, 2.5× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesTie

    Both handle text, vision.

  • OpennessTie

    Both are closed-weight, API-only.

It's a genuine coin-flip between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude Opus 4.7: 1 category wins each, with the rest tied. Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Claude Opus 4.7 does not. Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 200K, 2.5× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. Both target the same set of modalities (text, vision), so the deciding factors are price, context, and raw quality. Both are closed-weight, API-only.

Claude Opus 4.7 is the newer of the two, released 16 months after Claude 3.5 Haiku, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude 3.5 Haiku is usually picked for customer support and code completion workloads, while Claude Opus 4.7 sees more deployments in coding llm and coding agent. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 4.7
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedNov 2024Feb 2026
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Context window200K tokens500K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.80 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Output · 1M$4.00 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$8.40 vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$84.00 vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$144 vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.280
  • Claude Opus 4.7Pricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku if

Claude 3.5 Haiku fits when…

  • Fast
  • Cheap for Anthropic
  • Strong code at small size
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if

Claude Opus 4.7 fits when…

  • Strongest published SWE-bench Verified scores in agent settings
  • Best-in-class writing quality and voice control
  • Excellent long-context recall and citation discipline
  • Long-context tasks, handles 500K tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic's mid-tier 4.6 release, the workhorse model behind most production Anthropic deployments.

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Opus 4.7 cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?
    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude Opus 4.7 are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Neither model ships open weights, both are accessible only via their respective providers' APIs.
  • When were Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude Opus 4.7 released?
    Claude 3.5 Haiku was released by Anthropic on 2024-11-04. Claude Opus 4.7 was released by Anthropic on 2026-02-15.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.