Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Granite 3.1 2B
A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.
- PriceClaude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Granite 3.1 2B does not.
- Context windowClaude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.
- BenchmarksTie
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.
- ModalitiesClaude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Granite 3.1 2B.
- OpennessGranite 3.1 2B
Granite 3.1 2B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.
On balance Claude 3.5 Haiku edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Granite 3.1 2B's 1. Claude 3.5 Haiku publishes pricing ($4.00 / 1M output tokens) while Granite 3.1 2B does not. Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Claude 3.5 Haiku handles text, vision while Granite 3.1 2B handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Granite 3.1 2B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.
Granite 3.1 2B is the newer of the two, released 1 months after Claude 3.5 Haiku, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude 3.5 Haiku is usually picked for customer support and code completion workloads, while Granite 3.1 2B sees more deployments in edge deployment and on device. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Granite 3.1 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Other |
| Released | Nov 2024 | Dec 2024 |
| Modalities | text, vision | text |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | , | , |
| Input · 1M | $0.80 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Output · 1M | $4.00 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Knowledge cutoff | , | , |
| Open weights | No | Yes (Apache-2.0) |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
Pricing at scale
What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$8.40 vs ,
- Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$84.00 vs ,
- RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$144 vs ,
Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).
Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.280
- Granite 3.1 2BPricing unavailable
Benchmarks compared
Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.
Claude 3.5 Haiku fits when…
- Fast
- Cheap for Anthropic
- Strong code at small size
- Long-context tasks, handles 200K tokens vs 128K for Granite 3.1 2B.
- Multimodal needs covering vision.
Granite 3.1 2B fits when…
- Apache-2.0
- Tiny enterprise model
- Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Apache-2.0).
Consider Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.
Frequently asked
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Granite 3.1 2B cheaper?
Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.Which has the larger context window?
Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200K tokens vs 128K for Granite 3.1 2B.Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Granite 3.1 2B better for coding?
Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Granite 3.1 2B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.Are either of these models open source?
Granite 3.1 2B ships open weights (Apache-2.0). Claude 3.5 Haiku is API-only.When were Claude 3.5 Haiku and Granite 3.1 2B released?
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released by Anthropic on 2024-11-04. Granite 3.1 2B was released by Other on 2024-12-18.
The week's AI launches, in your inbox.
One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.