LLM·Dex
Newsletter

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Claude 3.5 Haiku specs · Gemini 2.0 Flash specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceGemini 2.0 Flash

    Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 10.0× cheaper on output tokens ($0.40 vs $4.00 per 1M).

  • Context windowGemini 2.0 Flash

    Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K, 5.2× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesGemini 2.0 Flash

    Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 3 modalities (text, vision, audio) vs 2 for Claude 3.5 Haiku.

  • OpennessTie

    Both are closed-weight, API-only.

On balance Gemini 2.0 Flash edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Claude 3.5 Haiku's 0. Gemini 2.0 Flash is roughly 10.0× cheaper on output tokens ($0.40 vs $4.00 per 1M). Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K, 5.2× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Claude 3.5 Haiku handles text, vision while Gemini 2.0 Flash handles text, vision, audio, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Both are closed-weight, API-only.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is the newer of the two, released 3 months after Claude 3.5 Haiku, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude 3.5 Haiku is usually picked for customer support and code completion workloads, while Gemini 2.0 Flash sees more deployments in rag and long context. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedNov 2024Feb 2025
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision, audio
Context window200K tokens1.0M tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.80 / 1M tokens$0.10 / 1M tokens
Output · 1M$4.00 / 1M tokens$0.40 / 1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff,2024-08
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$8.40 vs $0.900
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$84.00 vs $9.00
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$144 vs $17.40

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: $8.40 vs $0.900 per month, model B comes out ahead. Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: $84.00 vs $9.00 per month, model B comes out ahead. RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: $144 vs $17.40 per month, model B comes out ahead.

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude 3.5 Haiku$0.280
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash$0.030

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Claude 3.5 Haiku if

Claude 3.5 Haiku fits when…

  • Fast
  • Cheap for Anthropic
  • Strong code at small size
Pick Gemini 2.0 Flash if

Gemini 2.0 Flash fits when…

  • Long context
  • Cheap
  • Cost-sensitive workloads, 10.0× cheaper than Claude 3.5 Haiku on output tokens.
  • Long-context tasks, handles 1.0M tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
  • Multimodal needs covering audio.
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.

See Claude Opus 4.7 specsClaude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Flash cheaper?
    Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper at $0.40 / 1M tokens per million output tokens, vs $4.00 / 1M tokens for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
  • Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Flash better for coding?
    Both Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Neither model ships open weights, both are accessible only via their respective providers' APIs.
  • When were Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash released?
    Claude 3.5 Haiku was released by Anthropic on 2024-11-04. Gemini 2.0 Flash was released by Google on 2025-02-05.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.