Qwen2.5-72B for fine-tuning
Qwen2.5-72B is the #3 pick on LLMDex's llms for fine-tuning ranking out of 7 models we track for this use case. Below, the specific reasons it slots where it does, and when you should reach for an alternative.
Updated
At a glance
- Rank
- #3 of 7
- Context
- 128K tokens
- Output / 1M
- Pricing not published
- Released
- Sep 2024
Why Qwen2.5-72B fits this task
Three things about Qwen2.5-72B that map directly onto what this task rewards: Mature deployment. Beyond the task-specific fit, Qwen2.5-72B also brings apache-2.0 and strong multilingual, both of which compound when the workload broadens.
The criteria this task rewards
LLMDex ranks best llms for fine-tuning on 5 criteria , these are the axes the ranking uses, in priority order:
- Sample efficiency (quality lift per 1k examples)
- Catastrophic forgetting resistance
- LoRA / QLoRA support quality
- License compatibility for fine-tuned-derivative deployment
- Tooling maturity (Axolotl, Unsloth, TRL)
How Qwen2.5-72B scores on each axis
Where Qwen2.5-72B costs you: superseded by qwen3 for new builds. For most teams this is acceptable on this workload, the value of the strengths above outweighs the cost. For cost-bound workloads or teams with strict latency budgets, run an eval against the next two ranked models on real data before committing.
Strengths that pay off here
- Mature deployment
- Apache-2.0
- Strong multilingual
Tracked weaknesses
- Superseded by Qwen3 for new builds
When to pick something else
If you can pay slightly more or accept slightly different tradeoffs, Llama 4 70B from Meta ranks one position higher and tends to win on the hardest cases. Meta's mid-tier Llama 4, the practical workhorse for self-hosted deployments.
Run Qwen2.5-72B now
Skip setup. Deploy via a hosted provider in under a minute.
Other models for fine-tuning
- Llama 4 8B for fine-tuning
Meta's small Llama 4, built for on-device and edge inference.
Read guide - Llama 4 70B for fine-tuning
Meta's mid-tier Llama 4, the practical workhorse for self-hosted deployments.
Read guide - Qwen2.5-7B for fine-tuning
Small Qwen, practical default for laptop and edge inference.
Read guide - Phi-4 for fine-tuning
Microsoft's 14B model, exceptional quality-per-parameter via curated synthetic training data.
Read guide - Mistral Nemo for fine-tuning
12B model co-built with Nvidia, strong small-model multilingual performance.
Read guide
Qwen2.5-72B for other use cases
Direct comparisons
Frequently asked
Is Qwen2.5-72B good for fine-tuning?
Qwen2.5-72B is ranked #3 on LLMDex's fine-tuning list. The previous-generation Qwen flagship, still widely deployed for stability.How much does Qwen2.5-72B cost for fine-tuning?
Alibaba has not published per-token pricing for Qwen2.5-72B at the time of writing.What's a cheaper alternative to Qwen2.5-72B for fine-tuning?
The next ranked model on this task is Qwen2.5-7B. Compare both before committing.When should I NOT use Qwen2.5-72B for fine-tuning?
Tracked weakness: Superseded by Qwen3 for new builds. If that constraint is binding for your workload, the next-ranked model on this task is the safer pick.
Intelligence, distilled weekly.
One short email every Friday, new model launches, leaderboard moves, and pricing drops. Curated by hand. Free, no spam.