LLM·Dex
Newsletter

Llama 4 70B vs Mistral Nemo

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Llama 4 70B specs · Mistral Nemo specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceTie

    Neither model publishes per-token API pricing.

  • Context windowTie

    Both ship a 128K-token context window.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesLlama 4 70B

    Llama 4 70B supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Mistral Nemo.

  • OpennessTie

    Both ship open weights, self-host either one.

On balance Llama 4 70B edges ahead, winning 1 of 5 categories against Mistral Nemo's 0. Neither model publishes per-token API pricing. Both ship a 128K-token context window.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Llama 4 70B handles text, vision while Mistral Nemo handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Both ship open weights, self-host either one.

Llama 4 70B is the newer of the two, released 9 months after Mistral Nemo, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Llama 4 70B is usually picked for open source llm and edge deployment workloads, while Mistral Nemo sees more deployments in edge deployment and local llm. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecLlama 4 70BMistral Nemo
ProviderMetaMistral
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2024
Modalitiestext, visiontext
Context window128K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Output · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsYes (Llama 4 Community License)Yes (Apache-2.0)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day, vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day, vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day, vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Llama 4 70BPricing unavailable
  • Mistral NemoPricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Llama 4 70B if

Llama 4 70B fits when…

  • Self-hostable on commodity hardware
  • Strong all-rounder
  • Mature tooling (vLLM, SGLang)
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Pick Mistral Nemo if

Mistral Nemo fits when…

  • Apache-2.0
  • Single-GPU fit
  • Multilingual
Don't want either?

Consider Llama 4 405B

Meta's flagship open-weight model, sparse MoE design competitive with closed-frontier flagships.

See Llama 4 405B specsLlama 4 70B vs Llama 4 405BMistral Nemo vs Llama 4 405B

Frequently asked

  • Is Llama 4 70B or Mistral Nemo cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Both Llama 4 70B and Mistral Nemo ship a 128K-token context window.
  • Is Llama 4 70B or Mistral Nemo better for coding?
    Both Llama 4 70B and Mistral Nemo are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Both ship with open weights. Llama 4 70B is licensed under Llama 4 Community License; Mistral Nemo under Apache-2.0.
  • When were Llama 4 70B and Mistral Nemo released?
    Llama 4 70B was released by Meta on 2025-04-05. Mistral Nemo was released by Mistral on 2024-07-18.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.