LLM·Dex
Newsletter

Granite 3.1 2B vs Molmo 72B

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Granite 3.1 2B specs · Molmo 72B specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceTie

    Neither model publishes per-token API pricing.

  • Context windowGranite 3.1 2B

    Granite 3.1 2B accepts 128K tokens vs 4K, 32.0× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesMolmo 72B

    Molmo 72B supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Granite 3.1 2B.

  • OpennessTie

    Both ship open weights, self-host either one.

It's a genuine coin-flip between Granite 3.1 2B and Molmo 72B: 1 category wins each, with the rest tied. Neither model publishes per-token API pricing. Granite 3.1 2B accepts 128K tokens vs 4K, 32.0× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Granite 3.1 2B handles text while Molmo 72B handles text, vision, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Both ship open weights, self-host either one.

Granite 3.1 2B is the newer of the two, released 3 months after Molmo 72B, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Granite 3.1 2B is usually picked for edge deployment and on device workloads, while Molmo 72B sees more deployments in vision and open source llm. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecGranite 3.1 2BMolmo 72B
ProviderOtherOther
ReleasedDec 2024Sep 2024
Modalitiestexttext, vision
Context window128K tokens4K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Output · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsYes (Apache-2.0)Yes (Apache-2.0)
API availableYesNo

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day, vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day, vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day, vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Granite 3.1 2BPricing unavailable
  • Molmo 72BPricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Granite 3.1 2B if

Granite 3.1 2B fits when…

  • Apache-2.0
  • Tiny enterprise model
  • Long-context tasks, handles 128K tokens vs 4K for Molmo 72B.
Pick Molmo 72B if

Molmo 72B fits when…

  • Fully open (data + code + weights)
  • Apache-2.0
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Don't want either?

Consider DBRX

Databricks' 132B MoE, a notable 2024 open-weight release tuned for enterprise.

See DBRX specsGranite 3.1 2B vs DBRXMolmo 72B vs DBRX

Frequently asked

  • Is Granite 3.1 2B or Molmo 72B cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Granite 3.1 2B accepts 128K tokens vs 4K for Molmo 72B.
  • Is Granite 3.1 2B or Molmo 72B better for coding?
    Both Granite 3.1 2B and Molmo 72B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Both ship with open weights. Granite 3.1 2B is licensed under Apache-2.0; Molmo 72B under Apache-2.0.
  • When were Granite 3.1 2B and Molmo 72B released?
    Granite 3.1 2B was released by Other on 2024-12-18. Molmo 72B was released by Other on 2024-09-25.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.