Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-4.5
A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.
Updated
Gemini 3 Pro specs · GLM-4.5 specs- PriceTie
Neither model publishes per-token API pricing.
- Context windowGemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K, 8.2× the room for long documents and codebases.
- BenchmarksTie
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.
- ModalitiesGemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro supports 4 modalities (text, vision, audio, video) vs 2 for GLM-4.5.
- OpennessGLM-4.5
GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT); Gemini 3 Pro is API-only.
On balance Gemini 3 Pro edges ahead, winning 2 of 5 categories against GLM-4.5's 1. Neither model publishes per-token API pricing. Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K, 8.2× the room for long documents and codebases.
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Gemini 3 Pro handles text, vision, audio, video while GLM-4.5 handles text, vision, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT); Gemini 3 Pro is API-only.
Gemini 3 Pro is the newer of the two, released 4 months after GLM-4.5, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Gemini 3 Pro is usually picked for long context and rag workloads, while GLM-4.5 sees more deployments in chinese llm and open source llm. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Gemini 3 Pro | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Other | |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jul 2025 |
| Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | , |
| Input · 1M | Pricing not published | Pricing not published |
| Output · 1M | Pricing not published | Pricing not published |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01 | , |
| Open weights | No | Yes (MIT) |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
Pricing at scale
What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day, vs ,
- Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day, vs ,
- RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day, vs ,
Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).
Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Gemini 3 ProPricing unavailable
- GLM-4.5Pricing unavailable
Benchmarks compared
Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.
- MMLU91.8
- HumanEval95.4
- GPQA91.9
Gemini 3 Pro fits when…
- Massive 1M-token context window
- State-of-the-art vision and document understanding
- Strong reasoning at competitive price
- Long-context tasks, handles 1.0M tokens vs 128K for GLM-4.5.
- Multimodal needs covering audio, video.
GLM-4.5 fits when…
- MIT license
- Strong Chinese
- Multimodal
- Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (MIT).
Consider Gemini 3 Flash
Google's high-speed, low-cost mid-tier with the same massive context window, popular for high-volume RAG.
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-4.5 cheaper?
Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K for GLM-4.5.Is Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-4.5 better for coding?
Both Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-4.5 are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.Are either of these models open source?
GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT). Gemini 3 Pro is API-only.When were Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-4.5 released?
Gemini 3 Pro was released by Google on 2025-12-09. GLM-4.5 was released by Other on 2025-07-28.
The week's AI launches, in your inbox.
One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.