LLM·Dex

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Granite 3.1 8B

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Verdict by category
  • PriceGemini 2.5 Flash

    Gemini 2.5 Flash publishes pricing ($0.30 / 1M output tokens) while Granite 3.1 8B does not.

  • Context windowGemini 2.5 Flash

    Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K, 8.2× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesGemini 2.5 Flash

    Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 3 modalities (text, vision, audio) vs 1 for Granite 3.1 8B.

  • OpennessGranite 3.1 8B

    Granite 3.1 8B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Gemini 2.5 Flash is API-only.

On balance Gemini 2.5 Flash edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Granite 3.1 8B's 1. Gemini 2.5 Flash publishes pricing ($0.30 / 1M output tokens) while Granite 3.1 8B does not. Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K, 8.2× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Gemini 2.5 Flash handles text, vision, audio while Granite 3.1 8B handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Granite 3.1 8B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Gemini 2.5 Flash is API-only.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is the newer of the two, released 4 months after Granite 3.1 8B, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Gemini 2.5 Flash is usually picked for rag and long context workloads, while Granite 3.1 8B sees more deployments in enterprise llm and commercial use llm. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecGemini 2.5 FlashGranite 3.1 8B
ProviderGoogleOther
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2024
Modalitiestext, vision, audiotext
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.075 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Output · 1M$0.30 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff2025-01,
Open weightsNoYes (Apache-2.0)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$0.675 vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$6.75 vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$13.05 vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022
  • Granite 3.1 8BPricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash if

Gemini 2.5 Flash fits when…

  • Cheap and fast
  • Long context
  • Solid vision
  • Long-context tasks, handles 1.0M tokens vs 128K for Granite 3.1 8B.
  • Multimodal needs covering vision, audio.
Pick Granite 3.1 8B if

Granite 3.1 8B fits when…

  • Apache-2.0
  • Enterprise-friendly
  • IP-clean training
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Apache-2.0).
Don't want either?

Consider Gemini 3 Pro

Google's late-2025 flagship, set new benchmarks on long-context, vision, and reasoning at competitive pricing.

Frequently asked

  • Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 3.1 8B cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 128K for Granite 3.1 8B.
  • Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Granite 3.1 8B better for coding?
    Both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Granite 3.1 8B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Granite 3.1 8B ships open weights (Apache-2.0). Gemini 2.5 Flash is API-only.
  • When were Gemini 2.5 Flash and Granite 3.1 8B released?
    Gemini 2.5 Flash was released by Google on 2025-04-09. Granite 3.1 8B was released by Other on 2024-12-18.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.