Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 2 27B
A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.
Updated
Gemini 2.0 Flash specs · Gemma 2 27B specs- PriceGemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash publishes pricing ($0.40 / 1M output tokens) while Gemma 2 27B does not.
- Context windowGemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 8.2K, 128.0× the room for long documents and codebases.
- BenchmarksTie
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.
- ModalitiesGemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports 3 modalities (text, vision, audio) vs 1 for Gemma 2 27B.
- OpennessGemma 2 27B
Gemma 2 27B ships open weights (Gemma License); Gemini 2.0 Flash is API-only.
On balance Gemini 2.0 Flash edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Gemma 2 27B's 1. Gemini 2.0 Flash publishes pricing ($0.40 / 1M output tokens) while Gemma 2 27B does not. Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 8.2K, 128.0× the room for long documents and codebases.
No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Gemini 2.0 Flash handles text, vision, audio while Gemma 2 27B handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B ships open weights (Gemma License); Gemini 2.0 Flash is API-only.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is the newer of the two, released 7 months after Gemma 2 27B, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Gemini 2.0 Flash is usually picked for rag and long context workloads, while Gemma 2 27B sees more deployments in open source llm and edge deployment. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jun 2024 |
| Modalities | text, vision, audio | text |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 8.2K tokens |
| Max output | , | , |
| Input · 1M | $0.10 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Output · 1M | $0.40 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-08 | , |
| Open weights | No | Yes (Gemma License) |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
Pricing at scale
What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$0.900 vs ,
- Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$9.00 vs ,
- RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$17.40 vs ,
Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).
Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash$0.030
- Gemma 2 27BPricing unavailable
Benchmarks compared
Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.
- MMLU,75.2
Gemini 2.0 Flash fits when…
- Long context
- Cheap
- Long-context tasks, handles 1.0M tokens vs 8.2K for Gemma 2 27B.
- Multimodal needs covering vision, audio.
Gemma 2 27B fits when…
- Strong quality-per-parameter
- Well-supported
- Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Gemma License).
Consider Gemini 3 Pro
Google's late-2025 flagship, set new benchmarks on long-context, vision, and reasoning at competitive pricing.
Frequently asked
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemma 2 27B cheaper?
Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1.0M tokens vs 8.2K for Gemma 2 27B.Is Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?
Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 2 27B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.Are either of these models open source?
Gemma 2 27B ships open weights (Gemma License). Gemini 2.0 Flash is API-only.When were Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 2 27B released?
Gemini 2.0 Flash was released by Google on 2025-02-05. Gemma 2 27B was released by Google on 2024-06-27.
The week's AI launches, in your inbox.
One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.