LLM·Dex

DeepSeek-R1 vs o4-mini

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

DeepSeek-R1 specs · o4-mini specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceDeepSeek-R1

    DeepSeek-R1 is roughly 2.0× cheaper on output tokens ($2.19 vs $4.40 per 1M).

  • Context windowo4-mini

    o4-mini accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • Benchmarkso4-mini

    o4-mini leads in 1 of 1 shared benchmarks; the biggest gap is on GPQA (graduate-level reasoning), where it scores 81.4 vs 71.5.

  • Modalitieso4-mini

    o4-mini supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for DeepSeek-R1.

  • OpennessDeepSeek-R1

    DeepSeek-R1 ships open weights (MIT); o4-mini is API-only.

On balance o4-mini edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against DeepSeek-R1's 2. DeepSeek-R1 is roughly 2.0× cheaper on output tokens ($2.19 vs $4.40 per 1M). o4-mini accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

o4-mini leads in 1 of 1 shared benchmarks; the biggest gap is on GPQA (graduate-level reasoning), where it scores 81.4 vs 71.5. They differ in modality coverage, DeepSeek-R1 handles text while o4-mini handles text, vision, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1 ships open weights (MIT); o4-mini is API-only.

o4-mini is the newer of the two, released 3 months after DeepSeek-R1, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. DeepSeek-R1 is usually picked for reasoning and math workloads, while o4-mini sees more deployments in reasoning and math. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecDeepSeek-R1o4-mini
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
ReleasedJan 2025Apr 2025
Modalitiestexttext, vision
Context window128K tokens200K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$0.55 / 1M tokens$1.10 / 1M tokens
Output · 1M$2.19 / 1M tokens$4.40 / 1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff2024-072024-06
Open weightsYes (MIT)No
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$4.94 vs $9.90
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$49.35 vs $99.00
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$95.64 vs $191

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: $4.94 vs $9.90 per month, model A comes out ahead. Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: $49.35 vs $99.00 per month, model A comes out ahead. RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: $95.64 vs $191 per month, model A comes out ahead.

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • DeepSeek-R1$0.165
  • o4-mini$0.330

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

DeepSeek-R1o4-mini
  • GPQA71.581.4
Pick DeepSeek-R1 if

DeepSeek-R1 fits when…

  • Open-weight reasoning model on par with o1
  • MIT license
  • Cheap reasoning per token
  • Cost-sensitive workloads, 2.0× cheaper than o4-mini on output tokens.
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (MIT).
Pick o4-mini if

o4-mini fits when…

  • Strong reasoning at mid-tier price
  • Fast for a thinking model
  • Solid tool-use
  • Long-context tasks, handles 200K tokens vs 128K for DeepSeek-R1.
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Don't want either?

Consider DeepSeek-V3

DeepSeek's flagship 671B-parameter MoE, frontier-level quality at a tiny fraction of frontier prices.

Frequently asked

  • Is DeepSeek-R1 or o4-mini cheaper?
    DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper at $2.19 / 1M tokens per million output tokens, vs $4.40 / 1M tokens for o4-mini.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    o4-mini accepts 200K tokens vs 128K for DeepSeek-R1.
  • Is DeepSeek-R1 or o4-mini better for coding?
    Both DeepSeek-R1 and o4-mini are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    DeepSeek-R1 ships open weights (MIT). o4-mini is API-only.
  • When were DeepSeek-R1 and o4-mini released?
    DeepSeek-R1 was released by DeepSeek on 2025-01-20. o4-mini was released by OpenAI on 2025-04-16.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.