LLM·Dex

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3-32B

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Verdict by category
  • PriceClaude Sonnet 4

    Claude Sonnet 4 publishes pricing ($15.00 / 1M output tokens) while Qwen3-32B does not.

  • Context windowClaude Sonnet 4

    Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesClaude Sonnet 4

    Claude Sonnet 4 supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Qwen3-32B.

  • OpennessQwen3-32B

    Qwen3-32B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.

On balance Claude Sonnet 4 edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Qwen3-32B's 1. Claude Sonnet 4 publishes pricing ($15.00 / 1M output tokens) while Qwen3-32B does not. Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Claude Sonnet 4 handles text, vision while Qwen3-32B handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Qwen3-32B ships open weights (Apache-2.0); Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.

Both shipped within roughly a month of each other in 2025, so they share the same generation of training data and tooling. Claude Sonnet 4 is usually picked for coding llm and rag workloads, while Qwen3-32B sees more deployments in open source llm and edge deployment. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3-32B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
ReleasedMay 2025Apr 2025
Modalitiestext, visiontext
Context window200K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$3.00 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Output · 1M$15.00 / 1M tokensPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff2025-03,
Open weightsNoYes (Apache-2.0)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$31.50 vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$315 vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$540 vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude Sonnet 4$1.05
  • Qwen3-32BPricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Claude Sonnet 4Qwen3-32B
  • SWE-bench Verified65.0
Pick Claude Sonnet 4 if

Claude Sonnet 4 fits when…

  • Solid all-rounder
  • Mature deployment ecosystem
  • Long-context tasks, handles 200K tokens vs 128K for Qwen3-32B.
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Pick Qwen3-32B if

Qwen3-32B fits when…

  • Apache-2.0
  • Fits modest hardware budgets
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (Apache-2.0).
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen3-32B cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K for Qwen3-32B.
  • Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen3-32B better for coding?
    Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3-32B are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Qwen3-32B ships open weights (Apache-2.0). Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.
  • When were Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3-32B released?
    Claude Sonnet 4 was released by Anthropic on 2025-05-22. Qwen3-32B was released by Alibaba on 2025-04-29.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.