LLM·Dex

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Command R+ (08-2024)

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Verdict by category
  • PriceCommand R+ (08-2024)

    Command R+ (08-2024) is roughly 1.5× cheaper on output tokens ($10.00 vs $15.00 per 1M).

  • Context windowClaude Sonnet 4

    Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesClaude Sonnet 4

    Claude Sonnet 4 supports 2 modalities (text, vision) vs 1 for Command R+ (08-2024).

  • OpennessCommand R+ (08-2024)

    Command R+ (08-2024) ships open weights (CC-BY-NC 4.0); Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.

It's a genuine coin-flip between Claude Sonnet 4 and Command R+ (08-2024): 2 category wins each, with the rest tied. Command R+ (08-2024) is roughly 1.5× cheaper on output tokens ($10.00 vs $15.00 per 1M). Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K, 1.6× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. They differ in modality coverage, Claude Sonnet 4 handles text, vision while Command R+ (08-2024) handles text, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Command R+ (08-2024) ships open weights (CC-BY-NC 4.0); Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.

Claude Sonnet 4 is the newer of the two, released 9 months after Command R+ (08-2024), which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude Sonnet 4 is usually picked for coding llm and rag workloads, while Command R+ (08-2024) sees more deployments in rag and data extraction. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Sonnet 4Command R+ (08-2024)
ProviderAnthropicCohere
ReleasedMay 2025Aug 2024
Modalitiestext, visiontext
Context window200K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1M$3.00 / 1M tokens$2.50 / 1M tokens
Output · 1M$15.00 / 1M tokens$10.00 / 1M tokens
Knowledge cutoff2025-03,
Open weightsNoYes (CC-BY-NC 4.0)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$31.50 vs $22.50
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$315 vs $225
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$540 vs $435

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: $31.50 vs $22.50 per month, model B comes out ahead. Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: $315 vs $225 per month, model B comes out ahead. RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: $540 vs $435 per month, model B comes out ahead.

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude Sonnet 4$1.05
  • Command R+ (08-2024)$0.750

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Claude Sonnet 4Command R+ (08-2024)
  • MMLU,75.7
  • SWE-bench Verified65.0
Pick Claude Sonnet 4 if

Claude Sonnet 4 fits when…

  • Solid all-rounder
  • Mature deployment ecosystem
  • Long-context tasks, handles 200K tokens vs 128K for Command R+ (08-2024).
  • Multimodal needs covering vision.
Pick Command R+ (08-2024) if

Command R+ (08-2024) fits when…

  • RAG-tuned
  • Citation generation
  • Enterprise tooling
  • Cost-sensitive workloads, 1.5× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on output tokens.
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (CC-BY-NC 4.0).
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Command R+ (08-2024) cheaper?
    Command R+ (08-2024) is cheaper at $10.00 / 1M tokens per million output tokens, vs $15.00 / 1M tokens for Claude Sonnet 4.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200K tokens vs 128K for Command R+ (08-2024).
  • Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Command R+ (08-2024) better for coding?
    Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Command R+ (08-2024) are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    Command R+ (08-2024) ships open weights (CC-BY-NC 4.0). Claude Sonnet 4 is API-only.
  • When were Claude Sonnet 4 and Command R+ (08-2024) released?
    Claude Sonnet 4 was released by Anthropic on 2025-05-22. Command R+ (08-2024) was released by Cohere on 2024-08-30.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.