LLM·Dex
Newsletter

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM-4.5

A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.

Updated

Claude Opus 4.7 specs · GLM-4.5 specs
Verdict by category
  • PriceTie

    Neither model publishes per-token API pricing.

  • Context windowClaude Opus 4.7

    Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 128K, 3.9× the room for long documents and codebases.

  • BenchmarksTie

    No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores.

  • ModalitiesTie

    Both handle text, vision.

  • OpennessGLM-4.5

    GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT); Claude Opus 4.7 is API-only.

It's a genuine coin-flip between Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.5: 1 category wins each, with the rest tied. Neither model publishes per-token API pricing. Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 128K, 3.9× the room for long documents and codebases.

No directly comparable public benchmarks are available for both models, check the spec sheets for individual scores. Both target the same set of modalities (text, vision), so the deciding factors are price, context, and raw quality. GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT); Claude Opus 4.7 is API-only.

Claude Opus 4.7 is the newer of the two, released 7 months after GLM-4.5, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude Opus 4.7 is usually picked for coding llm and coding agent workloads, while GLM-4.5 sees more deployments in chinese llm and open source llm. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7GLM-4.5
ProviderAnthropicOther
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2025
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Context window500K tokens128K tokens
Max output,,
Input · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Output · 1MPricing not publishedPricing not published
Knowledge cutoff,,
Open weightsNoYes (MIT)
API availableYesYes

Pricing at scale

What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day, vs ,
  • Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day, vs ,
  • RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day, vs ,

Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).

Price calculator

Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.

  • Claude Opus 4.7Pricing unavailable
  • GLM-4.5Pricing unavailable

Benchmarks compared

Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.

Benchmark scores not yet available. We only publish numbers we can source from official model cards or independent leaderboards, see methodology.
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if

Claude Opus 4.7 fits when…

  • Strongest published SWE-bench Verified scores in agent settings
  • Best-in-class writing quality and voice control
  • Excellent long-context recall and citation discipline
  • Long-context tasks, handles 500K tokens vs 128K for GLM-4.5.
Pick GLM-4.5 if

GLM-4.5 fits when…

  • MIT license
  • Strong Chinese
  • Multimodal
  • Self-hosting and on-prem requirements, open weights (MIT).
Don't want either?

Consider Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic's mid-tier 4.6 release, the workhorse model behind most production Anthropic deployments.

See Claude Sonnet 4.6 specsClaude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6GLM-4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Frequently asked

  • Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.5 cheaper?
    Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.
  • Which has the larger context window?
    Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 500K tokens vs 128K for GLM-4.5.
  • Is Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM-4.5 better for coding?
    Both Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.5 are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.
  • Are either of these models open source?
    GLM-4.5 ships open weights (MIT). Claude Opus 4.7 is API-only.
  • When were Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM-4.5 released?
    Claude Opus 4.7 was released by Anthropic on 2026-02-15. GLM-4.5 was released by Other on 2025-07-28.
Friday digest

The week's AI launches, in your inbox.

One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.