Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 3 Pro
A complete head-to-head: pricing, context window, benchmarks, modality coverage, and openness, with a programmatic verdict synthesized from the underlying data.
- PriceClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet publishes pricing ($15.00 / 1M output tokens) while Gemini 3 Pro does not.
- Context windowGemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K, 5.2× the room for long documents and codebases.
- BenchmarksGemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro leads in 1 of 1 shared benchmarks; the biggest gap is on HumanEval (Python coding), where it scores 95.4 vs 92.0.
- ModalitiesGemini 3 Pro
Gemini 3 Pro supports 4 modalities (text, vision, audio, video) vs 2 for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
- OpennessTie
Both are closed-weight, API-only.
On balance Gemini 3 Pro edges ahead, winning 3 of 5 categories against Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet publishes pricing ($15.00 / 1M output tokens) while Gemini 3 Pro does not. Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K, 5.2× the room for long documents and codebases.
Gemini 3 Pro leads in 1 of 1 shared benchmarks; the biggest gap is on HumanEval (Python coding), where it scores 95.4 vs 92.0. They differ in modality coverage, Claude 3.5 Sonnet handles text, vision while Gemini 3 Pro handles text, vision, audio, video, which can be the deciding factor before you even look at benchmarks. Both are closed-weight, API-only.
Gemini 3 Pro is the newer of the two, released 14 months after Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which usually means a more recent knowledge cutoff and updated safety post-training. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is usually picked for coding llm and code review workloads, while Gemini 3 Pro sees more deployments in long context and rag. If pricing matters more than every last benchmark point, run the numbers in the calculator below before committing.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Released | Oct 2024 | Dec 2025 |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision, audio, video |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | , | 65.5K tokens |
| Input · 1M | $3.00 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Output · 1M | $15.00 / 1M tokens | Pricing not published |
| Knowledge cutoff | , | 2025-01 |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
Pricing at scale
What you'd actually pay at typical workloads. Numbers come from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day$31.50 vs ,
- Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day$315 vs ,
- RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day$540 vs ,
Light usage, 100k in / 50k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). Heavy usage, 1M in / 500k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates). RAG workload, 5M in / 200k out per day: pricing not directly comparable (one or both models are missing public per-token rates).
Estimated spend for the listed models at your usage. Numbers are derived from each model's published per-million-token rates.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet$1.05
- Gemini 3 ProPricing unavailable
Benchmarks compared
Only sourced numbers. Where a benchmark is missing for one model we show the available value rather than fabricating the other.
- MMLU,91.8
- HumanEval92.095.4
- GPQA,91.9
Claude 3.5 Sonnet fits when…
- Mature and battle-tested
- Strong code
Gemini 3 Pro fits when…
- Massive 1M-token context window
- State-of-the-art vision and document understanding
- Strong reasoning at competitive price
- Long-context tasks, handles 1.0M tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
- Multimodal needs covering audio, video.
Consider Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's mid-2026 flagship, ahead on SWE-bench, agent reliability, and writing quality.
Frequently asked
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 3 Pro cheaper?
Per-token pricing isn't published for at least one of these models, check each model's spec page for current rates.Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro accepts 1.0M tokens vs 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 3 Pro better for coding?
Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 3 Pro are competitive on coding benchmarks. See each model's individual spec page for HumanEval and SWE-bench scores where published. For an opinionated pick, consult our Best LLM for Coding ranking.Are either of these models open source?
Neither model ships open weights, both are accessible only via their respective providers' APIs.When were Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 3 Pro released?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released by Anthropic on 2024-10-22. Gemini 3 Pro was released by Google on 2025-12-09.
The week's AI launches, in your inbox.
One short email every Friday, new models, leaks, and quietly-shipped APIs you missed.